SEQ
  • Bienvenido a la SEQ
    • Junta Directiva
    • Misión, visión y valores
    • Elecciones para la renovación Junta Directiva de la SEQ 2021
    • Estatutos SEQ
    • Colaboradores
    • Hazte socio
    • Contacto
  • Noticias
    • Cursos
    • Agenda de Congresos
    • Sociedades Científicas
    • Revistas Científicas
  • Actividades
    • Reuniones
    • Congresos
    • Cursos de Formación
  • Revista Española de Quimiopterapia
    • Journal info
    • Advance articles
    • Search an issue
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
  • Documentos
    • Documentos de Consenso
    • Libros y monografías
    • Revista Infección y Vacunas
    • Informes
    • Declaraciones
    • Base de Datos
    • Otros
      • Curiosidades
      • Narraciones Infecciosas
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Buscar
  • Menú Menú
Abstract 2011

Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):213-216

Antimicrobial sensitivity of hippurate-negative Campylobacter and Helicobacter pullorum strains isolated from patients with diarrhea          


P. BASCUÑANA, I. PENA, J. J. PICAZO, A. C. VELASCO               
 

C. jejuni as well as some hippurate-negative Campylobacter species and related diarrheagenic organisms, are the leading cause of gastroenteritis in our environment all throughout the year. The aim of the present study was to determine the sensitivity of hippurate-negative Campylobacter and Helicobacter pullorum strains isolated from the stools of patients with diarrhea. We tested 39 Campylobacter coli, two C. lari and five Helicobacter pullorum strains identified by mass spectrometry analysis. The sensitivity to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, erytrhomycin, azithromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, tigecycline and chloramphenicol was tested by E-test. Most hippurate-negative Campylobacter and H. pullorum isolates studied showed high resistance to tetracycline and to the two fluorquinolones tested. On the other side, all strains were sensitive to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, tigecycline and chloramphenicol, while most of them were sensitive to both macrolides tested and to gentamicin. 

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):213-216 [pdf]

11 diciembre, 2009/por csanchez
Compartir esta entrada
  • Compartir en Facebook
  • Compartir en X
  • Compartir en LinkedIn
  • Compartir por correo
https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png 0 0 csanchez https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png csanchez2009-12-11 16:19:542009-12-11 16:19:54Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):213-216

REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA

  • Journal Info
  • Advance Articles
  • Issues
  • Submission guidelines
  • Submit a manuscript

Contacto

Telf.: 913 94 15 12
Email: [email protected]

Política de privacidad

Aviso Legal
Política de Privacidad
Política de Cookies

Tweets by TwitterDev
© Copyright - Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):209-211 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):209-211 Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):209-211 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):217-222 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):217-222 Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(4):217-222
Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba