Rev Esp Quimioter 2015:28(2):92-97

Mortality among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers in long-term care facilities                                  
 


ESTER VENDRELL, JOSEP A CAPDEVILA, PILAR BARRUFET, LLUÍS FORCE, GORETTI SAUCA, ENCARNA MARTÍNEZ, ELISABET PALOMERA, MATEU SERRA-PRAT, JORDI CORNUDELLA, ANNABEL LLOPIS, MªASUNCIÓN ROBLEDO, CRISÓSTOMO VÁZQUEZ              

 

Introduction. Little is known about the natural course of patients with chronic stable illnesses colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The aim is to determine the impact of MRSA colonization in mortality among long-term health care facility (LTHCF) residents.
Method. A multicenter, prospective, observational study was designed. Residents in 4 LTHCFs were classified according to MRSA carriage status and followed for 12 months. Treatment consisted of 5 days of nasal mupirocin in MRSA carriers.
Results. Ninety-three MRSA-carriers among 413 residents were identified. Thirty-one MRSA-colonized patients died during the study period, 11 of whom from an infectious disease. Independent predictors of their higher mortality rates included heart failure, current neoplasm, MRSA carriage and COPD at 3 months and these same factors plus stroke, Bar-thel index <40, pressure ulcers, and older age at 12 months. MRSA-persistence was 35% and 62.5% at 3 and 12 months, respectively.
Conclusions. MRSA colonization among frail LTHCFs residents is highly prevalent, and is associated with higher mortality. Despite treatment of MRSA carriers, many remained colonized. Factors that promote persistence of MRSA colonization, and the impact of their modification on mortality rates in these patients, need further investigation.

Rev Esp Quimioter 2015:28(2):92-97 [pdf]

/por

Rev Esp Quimioter 2015:28(4):214-216

Could ceftaroline be an alternative therapy for linezolid resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infections in Intensive Care Medicine?     

                        
FRANCISCO JAVIER CANDEL, ELVIRA BAOS, MERCEDES NIETO, JUAN JOSÉ PICAZO              

Introduction. Coagulase negative Staphylococcus continues generating interest in critically ill patients, due to their infections in extended admissions, in instrumented patients and due to their described multidrug resistance, which include glycopeptide heterorresistance and the increase in oxazolidinone resistance. Ceftaroline is a new cephalosporin with activity against resistant gram-positives, which, being betalactam, may provide adequate safety profile in the critical ill patient. The aim of this study was to determine the activity of ceftaroline and other antimicrobial agents against methicillin and linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Material and methods. We studied susceptibility of ceftaroline, tigecycline, daptomycin and vancomycin in a total of sixty-eight methicillin and linezolid-resistant S. epidermidis isolates with clinical significance from an Intensive Care Unit, using E-test.
Results. All strains were susceptible to the four antimicrobial agents, regardless of the level of resistance to linezolid.
Conclusion. Ceftaroline could be an alternative in the treatment of methicillin and linezolid-resistant S. epidermidis infections in critically ill patients.

Rev Esp Quimioter 2015:28(4):214-216 [pdf]

/por

Rev Esp Quimioter 2015:28(5):235-241

Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy in HIV-infected patients: results of a study in a real life setting     

                        
NICOLÁS DI BENEDETTO, MARTA MONTERO-ALONSO, MARINO BLANES, JOSÉ LACRUZ, SANDRA CUELLAR, EVA CALABUIG, JOSÉ LÓPEZ, MIGUEL SALAVERT              

Background. Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy may offer antiviral efficacy while reducing drug interactions, costs and toxicity. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy in a real life setting.
Methods. A retrospective analysis of all HIV infected patients, who had initiated DRV/r or LPV/r monotherapy, was performed. Patients whose HIV viral load had remained undetectable for at least two consecutive follow-up visits and who had no neurocognitive disorder or hepatitis B co-infection, were included.
Results. Sixty patients were included. The median (IQR) time to follow-up was 66 (33-118) weeks. The proportions (CI95%) of patients with virological failure were 6.3% (1.7- 20.2) and 25.0% (12.7-43.4), respectively, in the DRV/r and LPV/r groups (p= 0.0424). The proportions (CI95%) of patients with therapeutic success were 90.6% (80.5-100) in the DRV/r group and 60.7% (42.6-78.8) in the LPV/r group (p=0.0063). No protease inhibitor mutations were detected. During the follow-up, 6 patients with dyslipidemia normalized their lipid values. The median monthly cost was 410 (IQR 242-416) euros per person lower for the monotherapy than for the combined antiretroviral therapy.
Conclusions. Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy was effective in a real life setting. This study showed differences in favour of DRV/r as compared with LPV/r in terms of therapeutic success; however prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. Finally, although this study was not specifically designed to detect benefits in terms of costs and lipid profile, it shows evidence of a positive impact of monotherapy in these fields.

Rev Esp Quimioter 2015:28(5):235-241 [pdf]

/por