SEQ
  • Bienvenido a la SEQ
    • Junta Directiva
    • Misión, visión y valores
    • Elecciones para la renovación Junta Directiva de la SEQ 2021
    • Estatutos SEQ
    • Colaboradores
    • Hazte socio
    • Contacto
  • Noticias
    • Cursos
    • Agenda de Congresos
    • Sociedades Científicas
    • Revistas Científicas
  • Actividades
    • Reuniones
    • Congresos
    • Cursos de Formación
  • Revista Española de Quimiopterapia
    • Journal info
    • Advance articles
    • Search an issue
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
  • Documentos
    • Documentos de Consenso
    • Libros y monografías
    • Revista Infección y Vacunas
    • Informes
    • Declaraciones
    • Base de Datos
    • Otros
      • Curiosidades
      • Narraciones Infecciosas
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Buscar
  • Menú Menú
Abstract 2016

Rev Esp Quimioter 2016,29(1):32-39

Intraabdominal candidiasis in surgical ICU patients treated with anidulafungin: A multicenter retrospective study     

                        
EMILIO MASEDA, MARTA RODRÍGUEZ-MANZANEQUE, DAVID DOMINGUEZ, MATILDE GONZÁLEZ-SERRANO, LORENA MOURIZ, JULIÁN ÁLVAREZ-ESCUDERO, NAZARIO OJEDA, PURIFICACIÓN SANCHEZ-ZAMORA, JUAN-JOSÉ GRANIZO, MARÍA-JOSÉ GIMÉNEZ, ON BEHALF OF THE PERI-OPERATIVE INFECTION WORKING GROUP OF THE SPANISH SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE              

Introduction. Patients with recent intraabdominal events are at uniquely risk for intraabdominal candidiasis (IAC). Candida peritonitis is a frequent and life-threatening complication in surgically ill patients. International guidelines do not specifically address IAC. This study describes clinical features of IAC in critical patients treated with anidulafungin in Surgical ICUs (SICUs).
Material and methods. A practice-based retrospective study was performed including all adults with IAC admitted to 19 SICUs for ≥24h treated with anidulafungin. IAC was documented (Candida isolation from blood/peritoneal fluid/abscess fluid and/or histopathological confirmation) or presumptive (host factors plus clinical criteria without mycological support). Total population and the subgroup of septic shock patients were analyzed.
Results. One hundred and thirty nine patients were included, 94 (67.6%) with septic shock, 112 (86.2%) after urgent surgery. Of them, 77.7% presented peritonitis and 21.6% only intraabdominal abscesses. Among 56.8% cases with documented IAC, C. albicans (52.8%) followed by C. glabrata (27.8%) were the most frequent species. Anidulafungin was primarily used as empirical therapy (59.7%), microbiologically directed (20.9%) and anticipated therapy (15.8%). Favourable response was 79.1% (76.6% among patients with septic shock). Intra-SICU mortality was 25.9% (28.7% among patients with septic shock).
Conclusions. Among IACs managed at SICUs, peritonitis was the main presentation, with high percentage of patients presenting septic shock. C. albicans followed by C. glabrata were the main responsible species. Anidulafungin treatment was mostly empirical followed by microbiologically directed therapy, with a favourable safety profile, even among patients with septic shock.

Rev Esp Quimioter 2016;29(1):32-39 [pdf]

12 febrero, 2015/por csanchez
Compartir esta entrada
  • Compartir en Facebook
  • Compartir en X
  • Compartir en LinkedIn
  • Compartir por correo
https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png 0 0 csanchez https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png csanchez2015-02-12 00:00:002015-02-12 00:00:00Rev Esp Quimioter 2016,29(1):32-39

REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA

  • Journal Info
  • Advance Articles
  • Issues
  • Submission guidelines
  • Submit a manuscript

Contacto

Telf.: 913 94 15 12
Email: [email protected]

Política de privacidad

Aviso Legal
Política de Privacidad
Política de Cookies

Tweets by TwitterDev
© Copyright - Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2016;29(1):32-39 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2016;29(1):32-39 Rev Esp Quimioter 2016;29(1):32-39 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2016;29(1):1-7 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2016;29(1):1-7 Rev Esp Quimioter 2016;29(1):1-7
Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para garantizar el funcionamiento de la web, medir su uso y mejorar nuestros servicios. Puede aceptar todas las cookies, rechazar las no necesarias o configurar sus preferencias. Política de cookies

Configurar cookies

Necesarias para que la web funcione correctamente. No se pueden desactivar desde este panel.

Ayudan a medir el uso del sitio y mejorar sus contenidos.

Permiten publicidad, medición de campañas o personalización de anuncios.

Guardan preferencias o permiten contenido externo no necesario.