SEQ
  • Bienvenido a la SEQ
    • Junta Directiva
    • Misión, visión y valores
    • Elecciones para la renovación Junta Directiva de la SEQ 2021
    • Estatutos SEQ
    • Colaboradores
    • Hazte socio
    • Contacto
  • Noticias
    • Cursos
    • Agenda de Congresos
    • Sociedades Científicas
    • Revistas Científicas
  • Actividades
    • Reuniones
    • Congresos
    • Cursos de Formación
  • Revista Española de Quimiopterapia
    • Journal info
    • Advance articles
    • Search an issue
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
  • Documentos
    • Documentos de Consenso
    • Libros y monografías
    • Revista Infección y Vacunas
    • Informes
    • Declaraciones
    • Base de Datos
    • Otros
      • Curiosidades
      • Narraciones Infecciosas
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Buscar
  • Menú Menú
Abstract, Abstract 2018

Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):226-236

Direct-acting antiviral agents in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1-4 infections in a tertiary hospital

JUAN CARLOS DEL RIO-VALENCIA, ROCÍO ASENSI-DIEZ, LORENZO VILLALOBOS-TORRES, ISABEL MUÑOZ CASTILLO

Introduction. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease. Six different genotypes (GT) of HCV (genotypes 1-6) have been identified. The genotype is clinically relevant since the majority of current direct antiviral agents (DAA´s) do not have pangenotypic efficacy. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of real world patients and evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment regimens.
Material and methods. Retrospective and observational study carried out in a third level hospital. Study period: January 2015-January 2016. Inclusion criteria: HCV patients of any genotype treated with either DAAs ± rivabirin (RBV) or DAAs + RBV + pegilated interferon (Peg-IFN) regimens for 12 weeks. Exclusion criteria: patients without adequate clinical or analytical information available for further analysis. Patients treated for 24 weeks were excluded. The main endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12), and secondary endpoint was SVR24.
Results. A total of 515 patients were included (aged 55.52±8.97 years). GT1: patients treated with simeprevir + sofosbuvir (SIM + SOF), ledipavir (LDV)/SOF and paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir + dasabuvir (PTV/r/OBV + DSV) ± RBV had a SVR12 of 93.59% (190/203), 98.82% (N=84/85), 94.28% (66/70), respectively. Regarding daclatasvir (DCV) + SOF and SIM + DCV, everybody (19/19) and 87.5% (7/8) got SVR12, respectively. GT2: 71.42% (N=10/14) of patients achieved SVR12, concretely, SOF + RBV had a SVR12 75% (N=6/8). GT3: 43.75% (N=7/16), 90% (N=9/10) and 95% (N=19/20) of patients treated with LDV/SOF, LDV/SOF + RBV and SOF + DCV obtained SVR12, respectively. GT4: patients treated with LDV/SOF, SIM + SOF and PTV/r/OBV ± RBV had a SVR12 rate of 100% (21/21), 91.67% (22/24) and 92% (23/25), respectively. All patients that got SVR12 achieved SVR24.
Conclusion. Our study confirmed the efficacy data reported in clinical trials in a cohort of patients with GT1-4 and a wide range of basal characteristics.

Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):226-236 [Full-text PDF]

16 mayo, 2018/por Luis Alou
Compartir esta entrada
  • Compartir en Facebook
  • Compartir en X
  • Compartir en LinkedIn
  • Compartir por correo
https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png 0 0 Luis Alou https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png Luis Alou2018-05-16 17:03:232018-05-29 12:17:03Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):226-236

REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA

  • Journal Info
  • Advance Articles
  • Issues
  • Submission guidelines
  • Submit a manuscript

Contacto

Telf.: 913 94 15 12
Email: [email protected]

Política de privacidad

Aviso Legal
Política de Privacidad
Política de Cookies

Tweets by TwitterDev
© Copyright - Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):226-236 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):226-236 Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):226-236 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):227-246 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):227-246 Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31(3):227-246
Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para garantizar el funcionamiento de la web, medir su uso y mejorar nuestros servicios. Puede aceptar todas las cookies, rechazar las no necesarias o configurar sus preferencias. Política de cookies

Configurar cookies

Necesarias para que la web funcione correctamente. No se pueden desactivar desde este panel.

Ayudan a medir el uso del sitio y mejorar sus contenidos.

Permiten publicidad, medición de campañas o personalización de anuncios.

Guardan preferencias o permiten contenido externo no necesario.