Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):37-41

Prosthetic joint infection by Candida spp 

E. GARCÍA-OLTRA, S. GARCÍA-RAMIRO, J. C MARTÍNEZ, R. TIBAU, G. BORI, J. BOSCH, J. MENSA, A. SORIANO     

 

Introduction: Fungal periprosthetic infectionis a rare entity. The aim of this report was to review our experience in two different educational hospitals.
Material and methods: patients with documented prosthetic joint infection due to Candida spp. from February 2002 to October 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, microbiological data, treatment and outcome of each patient was recorded.
Results: Ten patients, 8 women and 2 men, with a meanage of 77.7 (range 66-92) years were identified. Nine patients had previous bacterial infection, received antibiotic treatment for more than 15 days and required multiple surgeries. The most frequent species was C. albicans with 6 cases. All patients received fluconazole and surgical treatment consisted of debridement without removing the implant in 3 cases and 2-stage exchange with a spacer in 7. The first surgical and antifungal approach failed in all cases and a second debridement was necessary in one case, a resection arthroplasty in 8 and chronic suppressive treatment with fluconazol in one. After a mean follow-up of 31 (range 2-67) months, two patients were free of infection.
Conclusion: Prosthetic joint infection was associated with long-term antibiotic treatment and multiples previous surgeries. Treatment with fluconazol and debridement or two stage replacement with a spacer was associated with a high failure rate.    

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):37-41 [pdf]

Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(3):143-150

Economic evaluation of interventions for infectious diseases in Spain: systematic review and comparative analysis      

F. CATALÁ-LÓPEZ, A. GARCÍA-ALTÉS, E.  ÁLVAREZ-MARTÍN, R. GÈNOVA-MALERAS, C. MORANT-GINESTAR            

 

Background: There exists the need to evaluate interventions addressed to prevent, control and reduce the burden of the infectious diseases; being economic evaluation an instrument can help to allocate healthcare resources efficiently. In this context, we assessed the evolution of economic evaluation of interventions for infectious diseases published in Spain, as well as we compared their main methodological characteristics with those of the studies directed to other diseases.
Methods: Systematic review and comparative analysis calculating odds ratios (OR). Electronic searches for literature beetwen 1983 and 2008 were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Knowledge, CRD, IME e IBECS, and manually in specialized journals and technical reports. The following variables were identified to analyze the characteristics of the reports: journal and year of publication, intervention, type of study, design, perspective, type of costs, financing source, and decision-making recommendations.
Results: One-hundred and one studies were included in the review. The main characteristics of the reports were: cost-effectiveness analysis (n=56; 55.4%), treatments evaluations (n=60;59.4%) and the use of decision analysis and mathematical simulation models (n=63; 62.4%). Economic evaluation studies of infectious diseases showed the following associations (compared to a cohort of studies of other disease conditions [n=376]): cost-benefit
analysis (OR, 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63 to 7.74), prevention (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 2.49 to 6.90), and societal perspective (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.43 to 4.56).
Conclusion: Although there is an increase in the number of economic evaluations of infectious diseases published during last decades, the studies showed heterogeneity in the quality of the information regarding methods of analysis and data sources.

 

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(3):143-150 [pdf]

Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):42-47

Clinical experience with linezolid for the treatment of neurosurgical infections  

D. SOUSA, P. LLINARES, H. MEIJIDE, J.M. GUTIÉRREZ, E. MIGUEZ, E. SÁNCHEZ, L. CASTELO, A. MENA      

 

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the clinical use of linezolid for the treatment of neurosurgical infections.
Methods: Retrospective observational study of a cohort of hospitalized patients who received linezolid for a culture-positive neurosurgical infection from July 2004 to February 2009 in a tertiary hospital in Spain.
Results: Seventeen patients were included in the study. Main comorbidities among these patients included one or more of the following: subarachnoidal or intraventricular hemorrhage (n=8), solid neurological cancer (n=7), corticosteroids(n=9) and hydrocephalus (n=6). Eight patients underwent acraniotomy and fourteen patients had an external ventriculardrainage (EVD) as predisposing factors for infection. Meningitis was the most common infection (11; 64.7%), followed by ventriculitis (4; 23.5%) and brain abscesses (2;11.8%). The main causative organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (13; 76.5%). Linezolid was used as theinitial therapy in 8 episodes, after therapy failure in 6 and forother reasons in 3. The oral route was used in 9 (52.9%) episodes; linezolid was initiated orally in 2 cases. The mean duration of treatment was 26.5 days (range 15-58). No adverse events were reported. Sixteen (94.1%) patients were considered cured.There was one recurrence. The mean length of hospital stay was 45.6 (range 15-112) days and the mean duration of follow-up was 7.2 (range 0.4-32) months. No related deaths occurred during active episodes.
Conclusions: Linezolid was mainly indicated in post-neurosurgical EVD-associated infections due to coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. It was used as initial therapy in most cases. A high rate of clinical cure was observed and no related adverse events were reported. More than half of the patients were benefited by the advantages of the oral route of administration.
    

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):42-47 [pdf]

Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(3):151-153

Usefulness of monitoring linezolid trough serum concentration in prolonged treatments      

R. SOUSA, R. LÓPEZ, J. C. MARTÍNEZ-PASTOR, C. CERVERA, G. BORI, S. GARCÍA-RAMIRO, J. MENSA, A. SORIANO           

 

Linezolid has proven valuable in musculoskeletal infections, however, failure and resistance have been described and toxicity is worrisome when more than 28 days are necessary. We describe the first 5 cases in whom linezolid trough serum concentrations were weekly measured and its relationship with clinical outcome and toxicity.
 

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(3):151-153 [pdf]