Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):32-36

Rapid detection of clarithromycin resistant Helicobacter pylori strains in Spanish patients by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism 

S. AGUDO, G. PÉREZ-PÉREZ, T. ALARCÓN, M. LÓPEZ-BREA    

 

Introduction. The aim of this study was to characterize the mutations types present in the 23S rRNA gene related to H. pylori clarithromycin-resistance strains in Spain and evaluate a novel PCR-RFLP method for detection of the most frequent point mutation in our population.
Methods. Gastric biopsies were obtained by endoscopy from patients with gastric symptoms. H. pylori was cultured according to standard microbiological procedures and clarithromycin resistance was determined by E-test. DNA extraction was performed by NucliSens platform with the NucliSens magnetic extraction reagents (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer instructions. Analyses for point mutations in 23S rRNA gene strains were performed by sequence analysis of amplified polymerase chain reaction products. Restriction fragment length polymorphism was performed using BsaI enzyme to detect restriction sites that correspond to the mutation (A2143G).
Results. We found 42 out of 118 (35.6%) strains resistant to clarithromycin by E-test. E-test results were confirmed for the presence of point mutation in 34 (88.1%) of these strains. Mutation A2143G was found in 85.3% of the strains. Analyses with the restriction enzyme BsaI was able to confirm the presence of A2143G mutation. There were 8 H. pylori strains resistant to clarithromycin by E-test but without any point mutationin the 23 rRNA gene.
Conclusions. We conclude that PCR-RFLP is a reliable method to detect clarithromycin-resistance H. pylori strains in countries with a high prevalence of clarithromycin-resistance as Spain. It may be useful before choosing regimens of H. pylori eradication.    

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):32-36 [pdf]

/por

Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(3):136-142

Which is the best empirical treatment in patients with urethritis?      

M. A. ORELLANA, M. L. GÓMEZ–LUS            

 

Objective. To know the best empirical treatment of urethritis in patients at the City Center of Madrid.
Methods. 2.021 urethral exudates were analyzed in men between January 2003-December 2007. In addition to the traditional cultures, it was determined the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis and Herpes simplex. The susceptibility of N.gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus spp was performed by disk diffusion method and U. urealyticum by Mycoplasma IST.
Results. The percentage of positive samples was: 30.6%. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were: U. urealyticum 9.9%, N. gonorrhoeae 7.4%, C. trachomatis 5.1% and Haemophilus spp 3.8%. The resistance of N. gonorrhoeae in the first period was: penicillin 11.8%, tetracycline 5.9%, ciprofloxacin 8.8% and presence of betalactamase 11.8%. In the second period: penicillin 9.7%, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1.4%, tetracycline 8.3%, ciprofloxacin 23.6% and presence of betalactamase 10.5%. Resistance to ciprofloxacin in non-MSM (men having sex with men) was 20% and in MSM 56.2% (p <0.05). Resistance of Haemophilus spp in the first period was: 38.2% ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 8.8%, clarithromycin 35.3%, cotrimoxazole 64.7%, cefuroxime 5.9%, ciprofloxacin 8.8%, tetracycline 12.1% and presence of betalactamase 26.5%. In the second period: presence of betalactamase 41.9%, ampicillin 53.1%, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 9.4%, cefuroxime 9.4%, clarithromycin 18.7%, tetracycline 34.4%, ciprofloxacin 15.6%, and cotrimoxazole 68.7%. Resistance of U. urealyticum was: ciprofloxacin 80.7%, ofloxacin 32.4%, erythromycin 17.5%, azithromycin 9.6%, tetracycline 3.5% and doxycycline 0.8%.
Conclusions. N. gonorrhoeae showed a level of resistance to tetracycline and ciprofloxacin higher in the second period, being significant for ciprofloxacin (p<0.05). Quinolone resistance was higher in MSM. Haemophilus spp showed a level of resistance to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline higher in the second period, being significant for tetracycline (p <0.05). U.urealyticum showed high level of resistance to ciprofloxacin (80.7%) and ofloxacin (32.4%) and low level of resistance to doxycycline (0.8%) and tetracycline (3.5%).

 

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(3):136-142 [pdf]

/por

Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):37-41

Prosthetic joint infection by Candida spp 

E. GARCÍA-OLTRA, S. GARCÍA-RAMIRO, J. C MARTÍNEZ, R. TIBAU, G. BORI, J. BOSCH, J. MENSA, A. SORIANO     

 

Introduction: Fungal periprosthetic infectionis a rare entity. The aim of this report was to review our experience in two different educational hospitals.
Material and methods: patients with documented prosthetic joint infection due to Candida spp. from February 2002 to October 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, microbiological data, treatment and outcome of each patient was recorded.
Results: Ten patients, 8 women and 2 men, with a meanage of 77.7 (range 66-92) years were identified. Nine patients had previous bacterial infection, received antibiotic treatment for more than 15 days and required multiple surgeries. The most frequent species was C. albicans with 6 cases. All patients received fluconazole and surgical treatment consisted of debridement without removing the implant in 3 cases and 2-stage exchange with a spacer in 7. The first surgical and antifungal approach failed in all cases and a second debridement was necessary in one case, a resection arthroplasty in 8 and chronic suppressive treatment with fluconazol in one. After a mean follow-up of 31 (range 2-67) months, two patients were free of infection.
Conclusion: Prosthetic joint infection was associated with long-term antibiotic treatment and multiples previous surgeries. Treatment with fluconazol and debridement or two stage replacement with a spacer was associated with a high failure rate.    

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):37-41 [pdf]

/por

Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(3):143-150

Economic evaluation of interventions for infectious diseases in Spain: systematic review and comparative analysis      

F. CATALÁ-LÓPEZ, A. GARCÍA-ALTÉS, E.  ÁLVAREZ-MARTÍN, R. GÈNOVA-MALERAS, C. MORANT-GINESTAR            

 

Background: There exists the need to evaluate interventions addressed to prevent, control and reduce the burden of the infectious diseases; being economic evaluation an instrument can help to allocate healthcare resources efficiently. In this context, we assessed the evolution of economic evaluation of interventions for infectious diseases published in Spain, as well as we compared their main methodological characteristics with those of the studies directed to other diseases.
Methods: Systematic review and comparative analysis calculating odds ratios (OR). Electronic searches for literature beetwen 1983 and 2008 were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Knowledge, CRD, IME e IBECS, and manually in specialized journals and technical reports. The following variables were identified to analyze the characteristics of the reports: journal and year of publication, intervention, type of study, design, perspective, type of costs, financing source, and decision-making recommendations.
Results: One-hundred and one studies were included in the review. The main characteristics of the reports were: cost-effectiveness analysis (n=56; 55.4%), treatments evaluations (n=60;59.4%) and the use of decision analysis and mathematical simulation models (n=63; 62.4%). Economic evaluation studies of infectious diseases showed the following associations (compared to a cohort of studies of other disease conditions [n=376]): cost-benefit
analysis (OR, 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63 to 7.74), prevention (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 2.49 to 6.90), and societal perspective (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.43 to 4.56).
Conclusion: Although there is an increase in the number of economic evaluations of infectious diseases published during last decades, the studies showed heterogeneity in the quality of the information regarding methods of analysis and data sources.

 

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(3):143-150 [pdf]

/por