Pneumococcal bacteremia in adult patients at a hospital in Madrid: serotypes and susceptibility                 

M. CORREA, J. C. SANZ, C. DE LAS CUEVAS, A. GUIU, D. DOMINGO, T. ALARCÓN, M. LÓPEZ-BREA                                                                       

 
Introduction. The aim of this study is to describe the distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes, its antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and the relation with vaccines in pneumococcal invasive strains isolated from blood cultures of adult patients.
Methods. All pneumococci isolated (67 strains) from blood cultures were serotyped by latex agglutination (Pneumotest latex) and Quellung reaction (Statens Serum Institut, Denmark). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing to penicillin (PEN), cefotaxime (CT), erythromycin (ERY) and levofloxacin (LEV) was performed by the E-test method (Biomèrieux, France).
Results. Among the 67 strains isolated, the most prevalent serotypes were 22F (11.9%) and 3 (11.9%), the second most frequent were 7F (7.5%) and 19A (7.5%). The coverage of the strains by the pneumococcal 7-valent conjugate vaccine (VNC7V), pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (VNC13V) and pneumococcal 23-valent polysaccharide (VNP23V) were 16, 49 and 82%, respectively. Serotypes 22F and 3 were responsible for 14 of the 48 episodes of pneumonia with bacteremia (29.2%) and only 2 of the 19 episodes (10.5%) of bacteremia without pneumonia. According to the 2007 CLSI criteria, 12 strains (17.9%) were non-susceptible to penicillin. Eleven of this 12 strains (91.7%) were resistant to erythromycin, simultaneously.
Conclusions. The most common serotypes were 22F, 3, 7F y 19A. Three of them (3, 7F y 19A) are serotypes that are covered by the new VNC13V but not by VNC7V. Serotype 22F is a serotype emergent that is not covered by the VNC7V. The percentage of non-susceptibility to penicillin and resistance to erythromycin was comparable to the percentage reported in our country.

Rev Esp Quimioter 2012:25(2):155-160 [pdf]

Nonantimicrobial effects of tetracyclines

L. GARCÍA-ÁLVAREZ, J. A. OTEO

Tetracyclines are a family of antibiotics very common in clinical practice that have been used in not infectious affections. One of their most studied actions is their ability to inhibit matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a group of proteinases that have been implicated in pathological processes as oncogenesis and inflammation. Tetracyclines have been shown to play an important role in malignant angiogenesis and cancer invasion, which is related with tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential. They also show anti-inflammatory activity in neurological, respiratory, bone and heart diseases, and in rheumatologic and dermatologic processes. The aim of this review is to make an updating about the non antimicrobial actions of tetracyclines, specially their therapeutic applications in different diseases.

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2010:23(1):4-11 [pdf]

Prosthetic joint infection by Candida spp 

E. GARCÍA-OLTRA, S. GARCÍA-RAMIRO, J. C MARTÍNEZ, R. TIBAU, G. BORI, J. BOSCH, J. MENSA, A. SORIANO     

Introduction: Fungal periprosthetic infectionis a rare entity. The aim of this report was to review our experience in two different educational hospitals.
Material and methods: patients with documented prosthetic joint infection due to Candida spp. from February 2002 to October 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, microbiological data, treatment and outcome of each patient was recorded.
Results: Ten patients, 8 women and 2 men, with a meanage of 77.7 (range 66-92) years were identified. Nine patients had previous bacterial infection, received antibiotic treatment for more than 15 days and required multiple surgeries. The most frequent species was C. albicans with 6 cases. All patients received fluconazole and surgical treatment consisted of debridement without removing the implant in 3 cases and 2-stage exchange with a spacer in 7. The first surgical and antifungal approach failed in all cases and a second debridement was necessary in one case, a resection arthroplasty in 8 and chronic suppressive treatment with fluconazol in one. After a mean follow-up of 31 (range 2-67) months, two patients were free of infection.
Conclusion: Prosthetic joint infection was associated with long-term antibiotic treatment and multiples previous surgeries. Treatment with fluconazol and debridement or two stage replacement with a spacer was associated with a high failure rate.    

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2011:24(1):37-41 [pdf]

Liposomal amphotericin B: a unique pharmacokinetic profile. An unfinished story                

J. R. AZANZA, J. BARBERÁN                            

La anfotericina B en su formulación liposómica continúa siendo un fármaco de referencia en el tratamiento de las infecciones fúngicas sistémicas a pesar del tiempo transcurrido desde que se desarrolló. La ausencia de resistencias de los hongos, la farmacocinética, y el mejor perfil de tolerabilidad en relación con el resto formulaciones de anfotericina B, son motivos suficientes para justificar su protagonismo, El liposoma que contiene la anfotericina B liposómica es muy estable en relación con la presencia de colesterol y los fosfolípidos no presentan termolabilidad, por ello la anfotericina B apenas está presente en forma libre (<1%) lo que explica la baja incidencia de efectos relacionados con la administración y la reducción de la incidencia de nefrotoxicidad (mitad que con la anfotericina B complejo lipidico) y que incluso en algún estudio a dosis de 1 mg/kg se ha mostrado inexistente.Este perfil justifica concentraciones plasmáticas muy elevadas y un volumen de distribución y aclaramiento reducidos, con una semivida de eliminación muy prolongada. Existen evidencias que señalan que el liposoma a través de la anfotericina B es capaz de fijarse al ergosterol presente en membrana de hongo y sólo en ese momento se produciría la liberación del antifúngico que ejercería su efecto farmacológico.

 
Rev Esp Quimioter 2012:25(1):17-24 [pdf]

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with daptomycin or vancomycin                     

C. RUBIO-TERRÉS, D. RUBIO-RODRÍGUEZ, N. MAJOS, S. GRAU                                                                                   

Introduction. The increased morbidity, mortality and high costs associated with bacteremia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major public health problem. Pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed to compare the efficiency of daptomycin (DAP) against vancomycin (VAN) in the treatment of this infection.
Methods. Retrospective, deterministic and probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis. The effectiveness of the treatments was estimated from the results of a randomized clinical trial, which compared DAP (6 mg / kg IV daily) and VAN (1 g IV every 12 hours), both with or without gentamicin (1 mg / kg IV every 8 hours). Resource utilization was estimated from the clinical trial of the drug datasheets and Spanish sources, the unit costs were obtained also from Spanish sources. Monte Carlo probabilistic analysis and deterministic analysis were performed.
Results. The clinical trial cure rates were higher with DAP (44.4%, 95% CI 43.5 to 45.4%) than with VAN (31.8%, 95% CI 30.9 to 32.7%) not statistically significant (p = 0.2203) but with economic impact. With DAP would occur less costs due to treatment failure (rescue antibiotics, additional tests, prolonged hospital stay and adverse reactions) than with VAN. In the base case the average cost of disease per patient was € 12,329 to € 12,696 with DAP and VAN (difference of 367 €). DAP treatment was dominant (more effective, with lower costs than VAN) both in the deterministic and probabilistic analysis. In the Monte Carlo simulation, DAP was the most cost-effective treatment in 100% of the 10,000 simulations, for a willingness to pay € 12,000 per additional cure (approximate cost of MRSA bacteraemia episode).
Conclusions. According to this model, daptomycin is more cost-effective than vancomycin in treating MRSA bacteremia. The higher cost of acquisition of daptomycin does not imply a higher cost of treating this infection.  

Rev Esp Quimioter 2012:25(4):283-292 [pdf]