SEQ
  • Bienvenido a la SEQ
    • Junta Directiva
    • Misión, visión y valores
    • Elecciones para la renovación Junta Directiva de la SEQ 2021
    • Estatutos SEQ
    • Colaboradores
    • Hazte socio
    • Contacto
  • Noticias
    • Cursos
    • Agenda de Congresos
    • Sociedades Científicas
    • Revistas Científicas
  • Actividades
    • Reuniones
    • Congresos
    • Cursos de Formación
  • Revista Española de Quimiopterapia
    • Journal info
    • Advance articles
    • Search an issue
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
  • Documentos
    • Documentos de Consenso
    • Libros y monografías
    • Revista Infección y Vacunas
    • Informes
    • Declaraciones
    • Base de Datos
    • Otros
      • Curiosidades
      • Narraciones Infecciosas
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Buscar
  • Menú Menú
Abstract, Abstract 2022

Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):192-203

Current situation of sepsis care in Spanish emergency departments

FERRÁN LLOPIS-ROCA, RAÚL LÓPEZ IZQUIERDO, OSCAR MIRO, JORGE ERIC GARCÍA-LAMBERECHTS, AGUSTÍN JULIÁN JIMÉNEZ, JUAN GONZÁLEZ DEL CASTILLO

Published: 1 February 2022

http://www.doi.org/10.37201/req/150.2021

Objective. To describe the approach to the patients with suspected sepsis in the Spanish emergency department hospitals (ED) and analyze whether there are differences according to the size of the hospital and the number of visits to the emergency room.
Method. Structured survey of those responsible for the 282 public EDs that serve adults 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It was asked about assistance and management in the emergency room in the care of patients with suspected sepsis. The results are compared according to hospital size (large ≥ 500 beds vs medium-small <500) and influx to the emergency room (discharge ≥ 200 visits / day vs medium-low <200).
Results. A total of 250 Spanish EDs responded (89%). Sepsis protocols are available in 163 (65%) EDs median weekly sepsis treated ranged from 0-5 per week in 39 (71%) ED, 6-10 per week in 10 (18%), 11-15 per week in 4 (7%), and more than 15 activations per week in 3 centers (3.6%). The criteria used for sepsis diagnosis were the qSOFA/SOFA in 105 (63.6%) of the hospitals, SIRS in 6 (3.6%), while in 49 (29.7%) they used both criteria simultaneously. In 79 centers, the sepsis diagnosis was computerized, and in 56 there were tools to help decision-making. 48% (79 of 163) of the EDs had data on bundles compliance. In 61% (99 of 163) of EDs there was training in sepsis and in 56% (55 of 99) it was periodic. Considering the size of the hospital, large hospitals participated more frequently as recipients of patients with sepsis and had an infectious, sepsis and short-stay unit, a microbiologist and infectious disease specialist on duty.
Conclusion. Most EDs have sepsis protocols, but there is room for improvement. The computerization and development of alerts for diagnosis and treatment still have a long way to go in EDs.

Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):192-203 [Texto completo PDF] [Supplementary material PDF]


1 febrero, 2022/por Luis Alou
Compartir esta entrada
  • Compartir en Facebook
  • Compartir en X
  • Compartir en LinkedIn
  • Compartir por correo
https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png 0 0 Luis Alou https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png Luis Alou2022-02-01 06:28:352022-03-13 08:31:25Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):192-203

REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA

  • Journal Info
  • Advance Articles
  • Issues
  • Submission guidelines
  • Submit a manuscript

Contacto

Telf.: 913 94 15 12
Email: [email protected]

Política de privacidad

Aviso Legal
Política de Privacidad
Política de Cookies

Tweets by TwitterDev
© Copyright - Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):192-203 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):192-203 Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):192-203 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):218-221 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):218-221 Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(2):218-221
Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para garantizar el funcionamiento de la web, medir su uso y mejorar nuestros servicios. Puede aceptar todas las cookies, rechazar las no necesarias o configurar sus preferencias. Política de cookies

Configurar cookies

Necesarias para que la web funcione correctamente. No se pueden desactivar desde este panel.

Ayudan a medir el uso del sitio y mejorar sus contenidos.

Permiten publicidad, medición de campañas o personalización de anuncios.

Guardan preferencias o permiten contenido externo no necesario.