SEQ
  • Bienvenido a la SEQ
    • Junta Directiva
    • Misión, visión y valores
    • Elecciones para la renovación Junta Directiva de la SEQ 2021
    • Estatutos SEQ
    • Colaboradores
    • Hazte socio
    • Contacto
  • Noticias
    • Cursos
    • Agenda de Congresos
    • Sociedades Científicas
    • Revistas Científicas
  • Actividades
    • Reuniones
    • Congresos
    • Cursos de Formación
  • Revista Española de Quimiopterapia
    • Journal info
    • Advance articles
    • Search an issue
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
  • Documentos
    • Documentos de Consenso
    • Libros y monografías
    • Revista Infección y Vacunas
    • Informes
    • Declaraciones
    • Base de Datos
    • Otros
      • Curiosidades
      • Narraciones Infecciosas
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Buscar
  • Menú Menú
Abstract, Abstract 2021

Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):50-62

Prognostic power of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for short-term mortality in patients seen in Emergency Departments due to infections

RAFAEL RUBIO DÍAZ, ELENA DE RAFAEL GONZÁLEZ, ESTHER MARTÍN TORRES, ELENA VALERA NÚÑEZ, AURORA MARÍA LÓPEZ MARTOS, DAVID MELGUIZO MELGUIZO, MARÍA PIEDAD PICAZO PEREA, PEDRO JESÚS LÓPEZ GARCÍA, PATRICIA FUENTES BULLEJOS, MATILDE CHAFER RUDILLA, JULIÁN FABIÁN CARRETERO GÓMEZ, MARÍA CARMEN LORENZO LOZANO, AGUSTÍN JULIÁN-JIMÉNEZ

Published: 3 December 2021

http://www.doi.org/10.37201/req/108.2021

Objectives. To analyse and compare 30-day mortality prognostic power of several biomarkers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, lactate and suPAR) in patients seen in emergency departments (ED) due to infections. Secondly, if these could improve the accuracy of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA).
Methods. A prospective, observational and analytical study was carried out on patients who were treated in an ED of one of the eight participating hospitals. An assessment was made of 32 independent variables that could influence mortality at 30 days. They covered epidemiological, comorbidity, functional, clinical and analytical factors.
Results. The study included 347 consecutive patients, 54 (15.6%) of whom died within 30 days of visiting the ED. SUPAR has got the best biomarker area under the curve (AUC)-ROC to predict mortality at 30 days of 0.836 (95% CI: 0.765-0.907; P <.001) with a cut-off > 10 ng/mL who had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 86%. The score qSOFA ≥ 2 had AUC-ROC of 0.707 (95% CI: 0.621-0.793; P < .001) with sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 89%. The mixed model (suPAR > 10 ng/mL plus qSOFA ≥ 2) has improved the AUC-ROC to 0.853 [95% CI: 0.790-0.916; P < .001] with the best prognostic performance: sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 97% with a negative predictive value of 90%.
Conclusions. suPAR showed better performance for 30-day mortality prognostic power from several biomarkers in the patients seen in ED due to infections. Score qSOFA has better performance that SRIS and the mixed model (qSOFA ≥ 2 plus suPAR > 10 ng/mL) increased the ability of qSOFA.

Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):50-62 [Texto completo PDF]


3 diciembre, 2021/por Luis Alou
Compartir esta entrada
  • Compartir en Facebook
  • Compartir en X
  • Compartir en LinkedIn
  • Compartir por correo
https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png 0 0 Luis Alou https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/LOGO-SEQ-800X400.png Luis Alou2021-12-03 10:30:152022-01-20 09:08:44Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):50-62

REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA

  • Journal Info
  • Advance Articles
  • Issues
  • Submission guidelines
  • Submit a manuscript

Contacto

Telf.: 913 94 15 12
Email: [email protected]

Política de privacidad

Aviso Legal
Política de Privacidad
Política de Cookies

Tweets by TwitterDev
© Copyright - Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):50-62 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):50-62 Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):50-62 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):63-70 Link to: Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):63-70 Rev Esp Quimioter 2022; 35(1):63-70
Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba